Home
LATEST on SATP
        Search

SEARCH ON SATP

 

SEARCH TERRORISM UPDATE

KEYWORD
START DATE
END DATE
  • South Asia
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Bibliography
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Afghanistan
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Bibliography
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheet
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
    • Capital Region
      • Kabul
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
    • East Afghanistan
      • Kapisa
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Kunar
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Laghman
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Nangarhar
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Nuristan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Panjsher
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Parwan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
    • North Afghanistan
      • Badakhshan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Baghlan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Balkh
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Faryab
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Jowzjan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Kunduz
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Samangan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Sar-e-Pul
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Takhar
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
    • South Afghanistan
      • Daykundi
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Kandahar
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Uruzgan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Zabul
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
    • Southwest Afghanistan
      • Helmand
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Nimroz
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
    • Southeast Afghanistan
      • Bamyan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Ghazni
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Khost
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Logar
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Paktika
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Paktiya
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Wardak
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
    • West Afghanistan
      • Badghis
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Farah
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Ghor
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Herat
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
  •  Bangladesh
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Bibliography
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
    • Islamist Terrorism
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Left-wing Extremism
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
  •  Bhutan
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Bibliography
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
    • Central
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Eastern
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Southern
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Western
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
  •  India
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Bibliography
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
    • Jammu & Kashmir
      • Assessments
      • Backgrounder
      • Bibliography
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Maoist Insurgency
      • Assessments
      • Backgrounder
      • Bibliography
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
      • Andhra Pradesh
        • Assessments
        • Conflict Maps
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Bihar
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Chhattisgarh
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Goa
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Gujarat
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Haryana
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Jharkhand
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Karnataka
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Kerala
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Madhya Pradesh
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Maharashtra
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Odisha
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Rajasthan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Tamil Nadu
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Telangana
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Uttar Pradesh
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Uttarakhand
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • West Bengal
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
    • Insurgency North East
      • Assessments
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
      • Arunachal Pradesh
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Assam
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Manipur
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Meghalaya
        • Assessments
        • Backgrounder
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Mizoram
        • Assessments
        • Backgrounder
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Nagaland
        • Assessments
        • Backgrounder
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Tripura
        • Assessments
        • Backgrounder
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
    • Punjab
      • Assessments
      • Backgrounder
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • ISLAMIST/OTHER CONFLICTS
      • Assessments
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
      • Andhra Pradesh
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Bihar
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Chandigarh (UT)
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Chhattisgarh
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Delhi
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Goa
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Gujarat
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Haryana
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Himachal Pradesh
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Jharkhand
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Karnataka
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Kerala
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Madhya Pradesh
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Maharashtra
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Odisha
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Pondicherry
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Rajasthan
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Sikkim
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Tamil Nadu
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Telangana
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Uttar Pradesh
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Uttarakhand
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • West Bengal
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
  •  Maldives
    • Assessments
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
    • Proviencs
      • Dhekunu (South)
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Mathi Dhekunu (Upper South)
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Mathi Uthuru (Upper North)
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Medhu (Central)
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Medhu Dhekunu (South Central)
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Medhu Uthuru (North Central)
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Uthuru (North)
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
  •  Nepal
    • Assessments
    • Bibliography
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
    • Provinces
      • Province No. 1
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Province No. 2
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Province No. 3
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Province No. 4
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Province No. 5
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Province No. 6
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Province No. 7
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
  •  Pakistan
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Bibliography
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
    • Balochistan
      • Assessments
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • FATA
      • Assessments
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Islamabad Capital Territory
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
      • Assessments
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Pakistan Occupied kashmir
      • Azad Kashmir
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Gilgit-Baltistan
        • Assessments
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
    • Punjab
      • Assessments
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Sindh
      • Assessments
      • Data Sheets
      • Documents
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
  •  Sri Lanka
    • Assessments
    • Bibliography
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
    • Provinces
      • Central Province
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Eastern Province
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • North Central Province
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • North Western Province
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Northern Province
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Sabaragamua Province
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Southern Province
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Uva Province
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
      • Western Province
        • Data Sheets
        • Documents
        • Terrorist Groups
        • Timelines
  •  Arunachal Pradesh
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Assam
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Jammu & Kashmir
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Manipur
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Meghalaya
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Mizoram
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Nagaland
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Punjab
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Tripura
    • Assessments
    • Backgrounder
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
  •  Maoist Insurgency
    • Assessments
    • Conflict Maps
    • Data Sheets
    • Documents
    • Terrorist Groups
    • Timelines
    • Andhra Pradesh
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Bihar
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Chhattisgarh
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Goa
      • Timelines
    • Gujarat
      • Timelines
    • Haryana
      • Timelines
    • Jharkhand
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Karnataka
      • Timelines
    • Kerala
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Madhya Pradesh
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Maharashtra
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Odisha
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Rajasthan
      • Timelines
    • Tamil Nadu
      • Timelines
    • Telangana
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
    • Uttar Pradesh
      • Timelines
    • Uttarakhand
      • Timelines
    • West Bengal
      • Assessments
      • Conflict Maps
      • Data Sheets
      • Terrorist Groups
      • Timelines
  • ASSESSMENTS
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • BACKGROUNDER
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • BIBLIOGRAPHY
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • CONFLICT MAPS
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • DATA SHEETS
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • DOCUMENTS
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • TERRORIST GROUPS
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • TIMELINES
    • Afghanistan
    • Bangladesh
    • Bhutan
    • India
    • Maldives
    • Nepal
    • Pakistan
    • Sri Lanka
  • BOOKS
    • The Knights of Falsehood
    • The Global Threat of Terror
    • Book Store
  • TERRORISM UPDATE
  • VIDEOS
  • FREEDOM FROM FEAR
  • WAR WITHIN BORDERS
  • SECOND SIGHT
  • ICM IN MEDIA
  • EXTERNAL RESOURCES
  • RISK ALERT
  • ISLAMIST EXTREMISM & TERRORISM IN SOUTH ASIA
  • SEMINARS/WORKSHOPS/PROJECTS/REPORTS

South Asia Terrorism Portal

SOUTH ASIA INTELLIGENCE REVIEW
[SAIR]

Weekly Assessments & Briefings
Volume 19, No.14, September 28, 2020
 
Data and assessments from SAIR can be freely published in any form with credit to the South Asia Intelligence Review of the South Asia Terrorism Portal.

ASSESSMENT

  • PAKISTAN: AF-PAK Border: Persistent Tension - Tushar Ranjan Mohanty
  • INDIA: Naga Talks: So Near, Yet So Far - Giriraj Bhattacharjee


PAKISTAN

 

    Print

AF-PAK Border: Persistent Tension
Tushar Ranjan Mohanty
Research Associate, Institute for Conflict Management

 

A Pakistani soldier was killed when militants from across the Afghan border attacked Security Forces’ (SFs’) post in the Bajaur District of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) on September 22, 2020.

A Pakistani Frontier Corps (FC) soldier was killed and another two were injured, after heavy mortar and weapons firing by militants, from across the border with Afghanistan, in the Binshahi Sector of the Lower Dir District in KP on August 5, 2020.

A solider, identified as, Lance Naik Samiullah, was killed when militants opened fire at an Army border check-post along the Pakistan-Afghan border in the Bajaur District of KP on July 29, 2020.

According to partial data compiled by the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP), since September 15, 2013, there were at least 114 such attacks in Pakistan by militants from across the border, in which at least 298 Pakistani SF personnel and 74 civilians have been killed, while another 306 sustained injuries (data till September 27, 2020). Five of these incidents (including the three mentioned above) resulting in nine deaths (eight SF personnel and one militant) were reported in 2020. In the worst incident of the current year (in terms of fatalities), three Army personnel were killed and seven were injured in cross-border firing by militants in the Bajaur District of KP on July 17, 2020.

There were seven such attacks in 2019 with 22 fatalities (20 SF personnel and two militants); nine attacks in 2018 with 34 fatalities (21 militants and 13 SF personnel); 18 attacks in 2017 with 68 fatalities ( 38 militants, 20 SF personnel and 10 civilians). 

The first militant attack, targeting fencing, from across the border reportedly took place on September 15, 2013. Major General, Sanaullah Khan and Lieutenant Colonel Tauseef, were killed along, with another soldier, Irfan Sattar, in an Improvised Explosive Device (IED) explosion the Pak-Afghan Border in the Upper Dir District of KP. The then Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) ‘spokesman’ Shahidullah Shahid claimed responsibility for the attack. Border fencing gained momentum after April 2013 and became the target of the terrorists, as their free movement across the border was being restricted.  

On the other hand, border-fencing linked clashes also take place between Afghan and Pakistani armed forces. According to partial data compiled by SATP, since April 2007, when the first such clash reportedly took place, there have been at least six such incidents, in which 48 persons, including 32 SF personnel and 16 civilians, have been killed (data till September 27, 2020).

Though the conflict over the legitimacy  of the Durand Line – the border imposed by Imperial Britain – between Pakistan and Afghanistan is more than a century old, the recent aggression linked to border-fencing started in September 2005 when Pakistan first announced that it had plans to build a 2,611-kilometre fence (1,230 kilometres in KP and 1,381 kilometres in Balochistan) along its border with Afghanistan, purportedly to check armed militants and drug smugglers moving between the two countries. But Afghanistan raised objections on the grounds that this was an attempt to make the disputed border permanent. After Afghanistan objections, the Pakistan authorities temporarily put the plan on hold.

Over a year later, on December 26, 2006, Pakistan again declared its plans for mining and fencing the border, but was again opposed by the Afghanistan Government. The then Afghan President Hamid Karzai stated, on December 28, 2006, that the moves would only hurt the people living in the region and would not stem cross-border terrorism.

The attempt to build the fence recorded the first border fencing-related skirmish in April 2007 in the then South Waziristan Agency. Pakistani SFs operating in South Waziristan made a three-tier security deployment on April 11, 2007, to stop cross-border infiltration by terrorists into Afghanistan. Pakistan fenced 12-kilometers of its border stretch with Afghanistan to ‘choke off’ cross-border infiltration, but Afghan troops tore down the fence on April 19, leading to a gun-battle, though there were no casualties.

Another attempt was made in May 2007 when Pakistan erected the first section of a fence in the Lowara Mandi area of North Waziristan on May 10, 2007, which led to cross border firing between Pakistan and Afghan forces in which at least seven Afghan soldiers were killed.

Despite Afghanistan’s opposition Pakistan later started excavation work on a several-hundred-kilometres-long trench along the Balochistan border in April 2013. Pakistan has since succeeded in making some progress. Providing details, Major General Asif Ghafoor disclosed, on January 27, 2019, that work on about 900 kilometres of fencing along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border had been completed. He added that work on another roughly 1,200 kilometres, the most sensitive portion of the 2,611 kilometres long border with Afghanistan, had commenced in 2018, and was expected to be completed by the end of 2020. According to latest information shared by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) on May 4, 2020, the fencing has been installed along more than 85 per cent of the border in KP, and almost 70 per cent in Balochistan. ISPR chief Major General Babar Iftikhar, in an interview on May 4, 2020, disclosed, “The stretch of Pak-Afghan border in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is near completion and the work is speedily underway on the stretch in Baluchistan”.

The Chief of Army Staff (COAS) General Qamar Javed Bajwa asserted on August 24, 2020, that the Pak-Afghan border fencing would solidify ‘security and peace’.

Meanwhile, Afghanistan continues to oppose Pakistani action to fence the border. The Afghan Ministry of Foreign Affairs on August 11, 2020, claimed that Islamabad was conducting “illegal” fencing along the Durand Line. It lodged a protest through the Afghan embassy in Islamabad to Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Pakistani Embassy in Kabul. The Afghan Ministry of Foreign Affairs protest came after the statement of the Deputy Governor of Afghanistan’s Kunar Province, Gul Mohammad Bedar, who asserted that Pakistan had started constructing the fencing in a ‘shifty way’. He also stated that Pakistan wanted to take over some important areas of Afghanistan.

However, on August 13, 2020, Pakistan rejected the Afghan foreign ministry's claim. Pakistan Foreign Office (FO) Spokesperson Zahid Hafeez Chaudhri, issued a statement, declaring,

Fencing along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border is being done to address Pakistan's serious security concerns and is fully in accordance with the established norms of international law, without encroaching into Afghan territory.

Pakistan meanwhile continues to shell the bordering areas inside Afghanistan to deter the Afghan Forces from raising any opposition to the fencing. In July 2020, the Afghan border forces in Kunar Province claimed that they had tried to prevent border fencing activities by the Pakistani Army alongside the Durand Line, but Pakistani Forces started firing missiles into Kunar Province. On July 21, 2020, Afghan National Security Adviser Hamdullah Mohib, during a visit to the eastern provinces, asserted that the recent artillery attacks by the Pakistani military forces on Afghanistan’s eastern Kunar province would not go without a response.

According to official data submitted by the Afghanistan Government to the UN on February 22, 2019, over the period 2012-17, Pakistani forces fired nearly 29,000 artillery shells into Afghanistan, killing 82 people and injuring 187. Since January 2018, Pakistani troops had been involved in 161 violations and fired more than 6,000 mortar and artillery shells into Afghan territory. Though, there is no current official data regarding cross-border shelling, the Pakistani side has not ceased shelling into Afghanistan border provinces, with frequent reports in the media regarding such incidents. On July 20, 2020, for instance, the Kunar Province Governor’s spokesperson Abdul Ghani Musamim disclosed, "Pakistani forces have fired 29 artillery rounds into Sheltan district of eastern Kunar province over the last 24 hours."

At least 22 persons were killed and 111 injured at Chaman International border in Qilla Abdullah District of Balochistan on July 30, 2020. Afghanistan accused Pakistan of killing 15 civilians and injuring 80 others during clashes. On Pakistan’s side, seven persons were killed and 31 injured. The Governor of Afghanistan’s Kandahar Province, Hayatullah Hayat, stated, on July 31, that shells fired by Pakistani SFs fell on homes in the border town of Spin Boldak, with women and children among 15 dead and 80 hurt. “If the Pakistani military continues its rocket attacks on Afghan territory, they will face retaliation by the Afghan army,” Afghanistan’s Defence Ministry stated.

The problem is that, under in the pretext of militancy, the Pakistan Army has been trying to legalise its century-old claims over the Durand Line by erecting the fencing unilaterally. In the context of the emerging situation in Afghanistan, volatility along the border is likely to increase over the foreseeable future.

 

INDIA

 

    Print

Naga Talks: So Near, Yet So Far
Giriraj Bhattacharjee
Research Associate, Institute for Conflict Management

On September 20, 2020, Khango Konyak ‘president’ of his own faction of the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland-Khaplang (NSCN-K2) revoked the expulsion of Isak Sumi. A ‘deed of reconciliation’ was signed between the two leaders – Khango Konyak and Isak Sumi. 

On September 12, 2020, NSCN-K2 ‘president’ Khango Konyak had expelled ‘ato kilonser’ (Prime Minister) Isak Sumi for “act against the ‘government’ – nepotism, tribalism".

Khango Konyak and Isak Sumi have now reportedly put aside their differences for the sake of the ‘impending’ solution to the Naga problem. The ‘deed of reconciliation’ was the result of interventions by other members of the Naga National Political Groups (NNPGs) and Civil Society Organisations (CSOs).  Apart from NSCN-K2, six other Naga militant groups constitute the NNPGs. These include: the NSCN–Neokpao-Kitovi (NSCN-NK), NSCN-Reformation faction (NSCN-R), Federal Government of Nagaland (FGN), Naga National Council (NNC)-Parent Body, Non-Accordist faction of NNC/National People's Government of Nagaland (NPGN/NNC-NA), and Government Democratic Republic of Nagaland /NNC-NA (GDRN). The NNPGs were included in talks with GoI on September 27, 2017, in an effort to widen the Naga peace talks. 

On September 19, 2020, Chairman Khango Konyak had held meetings along with the NNPGs and the Government of India (GoI) interlocutor for Naga talks R.N. Ravi. In this meeting the interlocutor had asked the NSCN-K2 leadership to sort out its differences.

Meanwhile, the major Naga group NSCN-Isak-Muivah (NSCN-IM) continued to maintain its tough stand.

On September 18, 2020, in a joint council meeting of the NSCN-IM held in Camp Hebron, it was unanimously decided that the group's standing demand for a separate flag and constitution needed to be a part of the final settlement in the ongoing Naga peace talks with the Centre. The NSCN-IM in its resolution stated,

The house unanimously adopted the resolution to reiterate the stand of NSCN that the Naga national flag and Yehzabo (constitution) must form a part of the Indo-Naga political solution in order to qualify the Naga deal as honourable and acceptable. Besides, the house also resolved that the Government of India and NSCN must seek a final agreement based on the historic Framework Agreement of 3rd August, 2015.

On September 11, 2020, the ‘convenor’ of the ‘steering committee’ of NSCN-IM, Hutovi Chishi, while claiming that the “Indo-Naga political talks” had reached a critical state, also insisted that the “Naga solution cannot be brought at the cost of compromising our historical and political rights”. He dismissed earlier agreements like the 1960’s 16-Point Agreement and the Shillong Accord of 1975 signed between the GoI and Naga groups, alleging they were “nothing but political flattery to suppress the legitimate Naga political movement.” The 1960 agreement led to the formation of Nagaland and in the Shillong Accord of 1975 the NNC accepted the Indian Constitution.

However, on September 15, 2020, a 15-member NSCN-IM delegation led by its ‘president’ Q. Tuccu and ‘vice president’ Tongmeth Wangnao, arrived at the national capital Delhi, purportedly to participate in peace talks. Reports indicate that NSCN-IM, led by ‘ato kilonser’ Thuingaleng Muivah, had been holding ‘informal’ parleys with Intelligence Bureau officials since August 2020 and these had gained momentum in recent weeks.

The series of talks between top Intelligence Bureau officials and NSCN-IM is taking place after differences with R.N.Ravi had e come out in the open and the Centre reportedly asked Ravi to maintain a low profile. An unnamed senior government official told the media, “Over the last six years R.N. Ravi, in his capacity as interlocutor, had been talking to various Naga groups. But in the past 10 or 11 months, things have not been going well.”

The differences between Ravi and the NSCN-IM came out in the open in June 2020.  Significantly, on June 16, 2020, without naming the NSCN-IM, Ravi asserted that “armed gangs” were engaged in “rampant extortions and violence”, adding that "the law and order in the state has collapsed". The NSC-IM, meanwhile, cited two instances – the October 31, 2019, deadline set by R.N. Ravi and the acrimonious exchange between the two sides during the peace talks on January 30, 2020 – as the reason behind rising differences

On August 11, 2020, NSCN-IM made two copies of the August 3, 2015 framework agreement public. One, which the group claimed as 'original', and the other in which R.N. Ravi had allegedly "craftily deleted the word new from the original" when he shared it with Naga Civil society and NNPGs. The one page 'original' agreement shared by NSCN-IM talks about "sharing the sovereign power" and provides for an "enduring inclusive new relationship of peaceful co-existence of the two entities". The NSCN-IM claimed,

It has been quite some time since Ravi was under NSCN's scanner when he twisted the Framework Agreement and misled the Parliamentary Standing Committee on the steps taken to solve the Naga issue...The fact is that the Framework Agreement is outside the purview of Indian Federation/Constitution. But in his report furnished to the Parliamentary Standing Committee he manipulated it in his own narrative that is far from the actual meaning as very unambiguously worded in layman's language in the original copy of Framework agreement.

The group reiterated its demand for Ravi's removal as interlocutor.

Curiously, Ravi continues to negotiate with other groups. Ravi met NNPGs on September 10. When asked about what transpired during the meet, an NNPG source said, “The interlocutor told us the government wants all stakeholders, including the IM [NSCN-IM], to be a part of this (peace process); that it is best for everyone to come on board and sign the agreement. What the Centre can agree on, it has already agreed to, and what the Centre cannot give at this point, it cannot give (even in future).” The NNPG source quoting interlocutor Ravi, added, “There is nothing left to negotiate beyond what had already been decided in October [31] last year [2019]. All that remains is for NSCN-IM leaders to fall in line.” After the meeting, the NNPGs stated that “the Naga issue must be settled and the waiting period is over.”

Meanwhile, a new deadline of September 2020 was set by the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) for conclusion of the peace talks. Unnamed Union Ministry of Home Affairs (UMHA) sources told Deccan Chronicle on August 27, 2020, that the Centre would not extend the deadline further, as almost all substantive issues had been finalised. The Centre, they said, had already told the Naga leadership what were the issues on which the Centre can agree or not, adding “no one can blackmail the government at gunpoint.” The UMHA source added, further, “The ball is now in the court of stakeholders, they can avail the opportunity to be a part of the historic Naga peace accord”.

The earlier deadline of [October 31, 2019] set by the PMO lead to unrest in the cadres and mid-level leaders in the militant ranks. In an interview to The Week on January 4, 2020, Lieutenant General Shokin Chauhan, the then chairman of the Ceasefire Monitoring Group (CFMG), stated,

There are three issues that are affecting the armed cadre. There is restiveness, as they do not know what the future holds for them. Whether they will get jobs or not, or what kind of life they are going to live? Will their own leaders be able to help them? Will the security agencies and the people of Nagaland, from whom they have extorted money, go after them?

These issues started creating problems before October 31 [2019], the deadline set by the government for a final solution. Their own leaders had stopped talking to them. The Assam Rifles was getting aggressive in its patrolling. I had to call several meetings with the insurgent groups to calm their nerves and make sure they maintained the ceasefire. Still, many leaders, especially the mid-level ones, were extremely worried and came close to breaking the ceasefire especially when the security forces came close to their camps.


However, NSCN-IM officials reject the idea of a deadline for the peace talks. Senior NSCN-IM deputy Kilo kilonser (home minister) Kehoi asserted,

The important thing is whether we have understood each other and agree together. I don't think there is any time limit set by the Government of India, and there should be no deadline again.

A source in the NSCN-IM who wished to remain anonymous also stated,

After the process of informal talks are over, decisions will be taken at the political level in formal talks with the government. There is no set time-frame for the resolution this time, but both parties are keen on settling the issue, and are looking at an agreement/solution at the earliest.

Meanwhile, the Naga groups have put more focus on recruitment of new cadres. In his interview of January 4, 2020, Lieutenant General Chauhan, the then chairman, CFMG disclosed,

The ceasefire ground rules clearly state that there cannot be any forced recruitment. All the groups sign these rules every year and, based on these ground rules, they state that they have been recruiting volunteers. Recently, in anticipation of the final accord, they resorted to massive recruitment. More than 800 youth are learnt to have joined National Socialist Council of Nagaland (Kitovi-Neopak); 80 to 100 youth joined the NSCN (Isak-Muivah) and the NSCN (Reformation); and around 50 to 100 youngsters have joined the group led by Khango Konyak. These figures take into account the large number of defections that have taken place…

The fate of the 'historic' framework agreement signed with NSCN-IM is under question. At this moment, it remains to be seen whether announcing a new deadline will push the militant groups into an inclusive agreement with the Government or alienate them further.

NEWS BRIEFS
 

Weekly Fatalities: Major Conflicts in South Asia 
September 21-27, 2020

 

Civilians

Security Force Personnel

Terrorists/Insurgents

NS

Total

AFGHANISTAN

6
77
91
0
174

INDIA

 

Jammu and Kashmir

2
1
6
0
9

INDIA (Left-Wing Extremism)

 

Chhattisgarh

2
0
0
0
2

Telengana

0
0
3
0
3

INDIA (Total)

4
1
9
0
14

PAKISTAN

 

KP

1
1
0
0
2

Sindh

0
0
1
0
1

PAKISTAN (Total)

1
1
1
0
3
Provisional data compiled from English language media sources.


AFGHANISTAN

Taliban has not cut ties with Al-Qaida, says US Special representative Zalmay Khalilzad: On September 22, the United States Special Representative for Afghanistan Reconciliation Zalmay Khalilzad indicated that the Taliban is yet to fully cut ties with al Qaida. The khaama Press, September 25, 2020.

Many of the released Taliban prisoners have returned to the battlefield, says HCNR Chairman Abdullah Abdullah: On September 22, Chairman of the High Council for National Reconciliation (HCNR) Abdullah Abdullah said that a number of released Taliban prisoners have returned to the battlefields. "I do know the exact number but I am aware that some released Taliban have returned to the battlefield, which is a violation of the agreement that they had made," Abdullah told an online conference with the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations. The khaama Press, September 25, 2020.

7,000 attacks initiated by Taliban militants in last six months, says Government: The Afghan Government said Taliban has initiated at least 7,000 military attacks over the last six months, which have killed and wounded nearly 3,500 civilians. "At least 7,000 offensive moves have been initiated (the Taliban) from the first of Hamal (March 22) to the 30 of Sunbula (September 20) and at least 3,500 of our countrymen were martyred and injured," the Ministry of Interior Affairs Spokesman Tariq Arian said." Tolo News, September 22, 2020.

98 civilians killed in Talban attacks in 24 provinces in past two weeks, according to Ministry of Interior Affairs: The Afghan Ministry of Interior Affairs data indicate that at least 98 civilians were killed and 230 others were wounded in Taliban attacks in 24 provinces in the last two weeks. "The Taliban has inflicted the casualties on our countrymen in 24 provinces and the most casualties have been in Takhar and Nangarhar provinces," said Tariq Arian, Spokesman for the Ministry of Interior Affairs. Tolo News, September 22, 2020.

BANGLADESH

BNP's intimacy with ISI and their men is very old, says Information Minister Hasan Mahmud: Information Minister Hasan Mahmud on September 25 said Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP)'s intimacy with Pakistani intelligence Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and their men is very old. He said that BNP has continuously chosen the path of conspiracy after repeatedly failing to face Bangabandhu's daughter Sheikh Hasina and AL politically. This has been proved that the recent meeting in the Middle East between the Pakistani intelligence and BNP- Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) alliance is highly shameful, he added. The Independent, September 26, 2020.

INDIA

Pakistan targeting Indian professionals working in Afghanistan, states Minister of State for External Affairs, V Muraleedharan: On September 21, Minister of State for External Affairs, V Muraleedharan, replying to a question in Lok Sabha (Lower House of Indian Parliament) said Pakistan attempted to designate four Indian nationals, who had previously worked in Afghanistan, as terrorists under UN Security Council resolution 1267. "However, the 1267 Sanctions Committee, based on its internal procedures, has not approved the request," he said". Deccan Herald, September 22, 2020.

Pakistan is using drones to drop weapons and narcotics, says J&K DGP Dilbag Singh: Jammu and Kashmir Director General of Police (DGP) Dilbagh Singh said on September 19 that Pakistan is using drones to drop weapons and narcotics. "It [Pakistan] is using drones to drop weapons and narcotics and also push terrorists from both Rajouri and Poonch districts, which had witnessed a spurt in ceasefire violations - almost on a daily basis," the DGP said. Daily Excelsior, September 23, 2020.

SFJ announces USD 1 million 'grant' to farmers of Punjab and Haryana for Khalistan support: The banned US-based secessionist group Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) announced a grant of USD 1 million for farmers in Punjab and Haryana in lieu of their support for 'Khalistan'. The announcement comes following the recent farmers' protest against the three contentious agriculture-related Bills passed by the Parliament. SFJ's offer has alerted security and intelligence agencies, which have shared the inputs with law-enforcement wings in both the States". IANS, September 25, 2020.

Bengal-Kerala Al-Qaeda module opened madrasa in West Bengal to radicalise Muslim youth, states NIA: The Al-Qaeda module which was neutralised by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) had opened a madrasa (Islamic Seminary) in Murshidabad District of West Bengal, which was used to radicalise the Muslim youth. Al Mamum Kamal, one of the accused in the case told investigators that a madrasa had been opened up and he had also raised funds for this purpose. One India, September 23, 2020.

90 Districts across 11 States affected by Naxals covered under SRE scheme, says Government: Union Minister of State for Home Affairs, G Kishan Reddy, informed the Rajya Sabha (Upper House of Indian Parliament) on September 21, that there are 90 Districts across 11 States in India which are Naxal [Left Wing Extremist, LWE] affected and are covered under the Security Related Expenditure (SRE) scheme. These include 19 Districts in Jharkhand, 16 Districts in Bihar, 15 Districts in Odisha, 14 Districts in Chhattisgarh, 8 Districts in Telangana, 6 Districts in Andhra Pradesh, three Districts each in Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and Kerala, two Districts in Madhya Pradesh and one District in West Bengal. Republic World, September 22, 2020.

PAKISTAN

State-backed death squads have spilt the blood of the Baloch, says VBMP vice-chairman Mama Qadeer Baloch: Mama Qadeer Baloch, the vice-chairman of the Voice for Baloch Missing Persons (VBMP), said on September 20, that the state-backed death squads have spilt the blood of the Baloch in several areas of Balochistan in August. He said that dozens have been shot down. "Death squads have been formulated and licensed for carrying out carnage in Balochistan", he added. The VBMP on September 20, completed its 4075th days of protest against extra-judicial killing and forced disappearances. Sangar Publication, September 23, 2020.

SRI LANKA

President calls on UN to end 'political witch hunts' against Member States: President Gotabaya Rajapaksa called on the United Nations (UN) to end the 'political witch hunts' through questionable motives against Member States in order to ensure the sustainability and the credibility of the Organization. In a pre-recorded address to the United Nations General Assembly's annual debate, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa said "Democratically elected governments of nations understand the pulse and needs of their people the best. It is the responsibility of the UN to assist and support processes of such elected Governments to bring about sustainable solutions for needs of their people. Colombo Page, September 24, 2020.

 
For assessments on other South Asian countries and for daily news updates on terrorism visit
South Asia Terrorism Portal 

The South Asia Intelligence Review (SAIR) is a weekly service that brings you regular data, assessments and news briefs on terrorism, insurgencies and sub-conventional warfare, on counter-terrorism responses and policies, as well as on related economic, political, and social issues, in the South Asian region.

SAIR is a project of the Institute for Conflict Management and the South Asia Terrorism Portal

 
South Asia Intelligence Review [SAIR]

Publisher
Dr. Ajai Sahni

Editor
Dr. Ajai Sahni


A Project of the
Institute For Conflict Management
IIIrd Floor, Apsara Arcade, B-1/8, Pusa Road New Delhi, INDIA
Telefax: 91-11-2575 0374, 470 50983
Email: [email protected]            Website: www.satp.org

To receive FREE advance copies of SAIR by email Subscribe.
Recommend South Asia Intelligence Review (SAIR) To A Friend

 

SAIR
  • Volume 19, No. 52
  • Volume 19, No. 51
  • Volume 19, No. 50
  • Volume 19, No. 49
  • Volume 19, No. 48
  • Volume 19, No. 47
  • Volume 19, No. 46
  • Volume 19, No. 45
  • Volume 19, No. 44
  • Volume 19, No. 43
  • Volume 19, No. 42
  • Volume 19, No. 41
  • Volume 19, No. 40
  • Volume 19, No. 39
  • Volume 19, No. 38
  • Volume 19, No. 37
  • Volume 19, No. 36
  • Volume 19, No. 35
  • Volume 19, No. 34
  • Volume 19, No. 33
  • Volume 19, No. 32
  • Volume 19, No. 31
  • Volume 19, No. 30
  • Volume 19, No. 29
  • Volume 19, No. 28
  • Volume 19, No. 27
  • Volume 19, No. 26
  • Volume 19, No. 25
  • Volume 19, No. 24
  • Volume 19, No. 23
  • Volume 19, No. 22
  • Volume 19, No. 21
  • Volume 19, No. 20
  • Volume 19, No. 19
  • Volume 19, No. 18
  • Volume 19, No. 17
  • Volume 19, No. 16
  • Volume 19, No. 15
  • Volume 19, No. 14
  • Volume 19, No. 13
  • Volume 19, No. 12
  • Volume 19, No. 11
  • Volume 19, No. 10
  • Volume 19, No. 9
  • Volume 19, No. 8
  • Volume 19, No. 7
  • Volume 19, No. 6
  • Volume 19, No. 5
  • Volume 19, No. 4
  • Volume 19, No. 3
  • Volume 19, No. 2
  • Volume 19, No. 1
  • LATEST ON SATP

  • South Asia Intelligence Review
  • South Asia Fatalities Data 2023
  • South Asia Timeline Data 2023
  • South Asia Assessment
  • South Asia Documents
  • Fatalities in Terrorist Violence

  • Terrorism Related Fatalities in Afghanistan
  • Terrorism Related Fatalities in Bangladesh
  • Terrorism Related Fatalities in Bhutan
  • Terrorism Related Fatalities in India
  • Terrorism Related Fatalities in Nepal
  • Terrorism Related Fatalities in Pakistan
  • Terrorism Related Fatalities in Sri Lanka
  • Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Support Us
  • Faculty
  • Feedback
  • Social Links

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • Disclaimer

Newsletter

copyright © satp 2017, all right reserved.
In Case of Problem in Access Click Here to go to Old SATP Website.